Editor's Choice
Platinum announces strategic review
Platinum said following the review Platinum Capital and Platinum Asia Investments may be wound up.
Sequoia chief's job at stake in upcoming EGM
Sequoia Financial Group will hold an Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) in June that will consider a resolution to remove chief executive and managing director Garry Crole.
Scott Farquhar steps down from Atlassian
After more than two decades at the helm, Scott Farquhar will step down as co-chief executive of Atlassian.
Goldman Sachs ditches robo-adviser Marcus Invest
The investment bank is offloading Marcus Invest to Betterment just three years after announcing it will launch the digital adviser.
Further Reading
Sponsored by | Where do advisers invest their time?The stage 3 tax cuts have sparked discussions on bracket creep. Implementing a tax-effective investment strategy is crucial now more than ever. |
Sponsored by | Quality and Yield. A Powerful combination.With central bank rates seemingly peaked, investors are not awaiting yield increases. We're bucking the trend with investment rates at decadal highs |
Sponsored by | Why it could be a good time to be a growth contrarianGrowth-style companies are in vogue, but you may need to think outside the box to ensure you don't overpay. |
Products
Featured Profile
Fiona Mann
HEAD OF LISTED EQUITIES AND ESG
BRIGHTER SUPER
BRIGHTER SUPER
Brighter Super head of listed equities and ESG Fiona Mann was shaped by a childhood steeped in military-like discipline and global nomadism. Andrew McKean writes.
Maybe ASIC staff should have to complete an annual exam to see if they know how to do their jobs.
Maybe AISC should have another exam for Metcraft.
'r b' and 'Steve C' - WELL SAID!! - and nowhere near as silly or funny as it sounds. A bit of 'take your own medicine' won't hurt the 'ol ASIC methinks. Get them tested to see if they act "in the best interests" of those put in their charge! And do it every year and make sure everyone at ASIC does an online CPD to ensure we can be sure they haven't forgotten how to look after those they are supposed to.
Unbelievable that ASIC were allegedly negligent like this. This truly puts risk advisers sins out to pasture compared to the hurt ASIC has, by their alleged inaction, caused the poor unfortunate investors who trusted Storm.
If I had servants in my home this bad they'd be sacked on the spot. The heads at ASIC deserve all they might potentially get in a law suit. Leave the reputable advisers alone and fix your own house first before you puff out your chest and think you know what is best for our industry. Gooses!
Levitt's are hoping 3,000 ex Storm investors will contribute $2,000 each to finance the case. It's taken 5 years to get settlements from the banks and some victims are still waiting. Many Storm investors were retirees - how many will be alive at the end of another protracted court case?